Minimizing Requirements: shipping end-user value

A project to be considered succesful, must accomplish several goals simultaneously:

  • schedule
  • budget
  • scope attainment
  • stakeholder expectation management
  • end user adoption (or market success)

A 2002 Standish Group study on Feature Usage on Typical Software Packages found that only the 7% of the features developed (more or less only the 7% of the budget) are always used:

N. of Features
Never or rarely 64%
Sometimes 16%
Often 13%
Always 7%

It means that the majority of the value (features often and always used) is derived from 20% of the work; (our old friend the Pareto principle again).

So, we need to identify and remove from the requirements all the features involved in that 64% (features never or rarely used). How can we do this?

We can apply the Occam’s Razor that “simpler solutions are, other things being equal, generally better than more complex ones“, or in short, “less is more“; and instead of the ‘do we have everything we need?’ approach, we have to ask ‘do we need everything we have?‘.

The best way to identify that ‘simpler solution’ is to first ask what is the minimum amount of scope required to produce the desired result, and this is one of the primary benefits of the Agile Methodology. Agile projects start with the ‘bare necessities’ feature list, building and shipping the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) and incrementally adding the next features prioritized to maximize the end-user value.

Summary: the main goal of an application is to ship end-user value as soon as possible, so we have to identify the Minimun Viable Product and be ruthless in the pursuit of minimizing scope and requirements, very carefully selecting the next features to add.

-These Notes have been taken from Roger Kastner, in the post Why Projects Succeed: Minimize Scope and Requirements.-
the place for my daily writing
Do you remember what you did last week? and what about how you felt? and last month? and last year?
sign up free 


  1. Pingback: Test your Product Concept | Jesús Gil Hernández

  2. Ed Ahemaf

    There’s an expression: “Fast, Cheap, or Good – pick two.” It’s probably most applicable to OPM funded projects, your tax dollars at work. Government systems acquisition programs are good examples, but don’t get me started, OK?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *